Who Was the First President to Be Impeached?

2021-05-20

who

Who Was the First President to Be Impeached?

In the annals of American history, Andrew Johnson stands as the first president to undergo the solemn proceedings of impeachment. The year was 1868, and the nation, still reeling from the wounds of the Civil War, found itself embroiled in a bitter clash between the executive and legislative branches of government. At the heart of this conflict lay a fundamental disagreement over the role of the president in the Reconstruction Era, a period of profound transformation and upheaval.

As the nation grappled with the aftermath of the war, President Johnson emerged as a staunch advocate for a lenient approach towards the defeated Confederate states. He believed that a swift and generous reconciliation was essential for healing the nation's wounds and restoring its unity. However, his vision clashed with the Radical Republicans in Congress, who demanded more aggressive measures to ensure the rights of African Americans and punish the former Confederate leaders.

The escalating tensions between President Johnson and the Radical Republicans culminated in a series of events that would ultimately lead to his impeachment. His vetoes of key Reconstruction bills, his dismissal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, and his public defiance of Congress all served as catalysts for the growing movement to remove him from office.

Who was the first president to be impeached

Andrew Johnson, 17th President of the United States, holds the dubious distinction of being the first president to undergo impeachment proceedings.

President during Reconstruction Era
Lenient approach towards defeated Confederate states
Clashes with Radical Republicans in Congress
Vetoes of Reconstruction bills
Dismissal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton
Impeached by the House of Representatives
Acquitted by the Senate
Remains in office

Despite being impeached by the House of Representatives, Johnson was ultimately acquitted by the Senate and remained in office until the end of his term.

President during Reconstruction Era

Andrew Johnson assumed the presidency in 1865 following the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. The nation stood at a critical juncture, grappling with the aftermath of the Civil War and the daunting task of reconstructing a shattered Union.

Lenient Reconstruction Policies:

Johnson's approach to Reconstruction was marked by leniency towards the defeated Confederate states. He believed that a swift and generous reconciliation was essential for healing the nation's wounds and restoring its unity.
Presidential Reconstruction:

Johnson sought to implement Reconstruction through executive orders and proclamations, bypassing Congress. He issued amnesty to former Confederates, restored their civil rights, and appointed provisional governors in the Southern states.
Clash with Radical Republicans:

Johnson's Reconstruction policies clashed with the Radical Republicans in Congress, who demanded more aggressive measures to ensure the rights of African Americans and punish the former Confederate leaders.
Vetoes and Override Attempts:

Johnson vetoed several Reconstruction bills passed by Congress, including the Freedmen's Bureau Bill and the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Congress successfully overrode some of his vetoes, further escalating tensions between the two branches of government.

Johnson's Reconstruction policies and his clashes with Congress ultimately led to his impeachment in 1868. He was accused of violating the Tenure of Office Act, which prohibited the president from removing certain government officials without the consent of the Senate.

Lenient approach towards defeated Confederate states

President Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction policies were characterized by a spirit of leniency and conciliation towards the defeated Confederate states. He believed that a swift and generous reconciliation was essential for healing the nation's wounds and restoring its unity.

Johnson's lenient approach manifested in several key aspects:

Amnesty and Restoration of Civil Rights: Johnson issued a series of proclamations granting amnesty to former Confederates, restoring their civil rights, and allowing them to participate in the political process. This policy was intended to promote reconciliation and encourage the Southern states to rejoin the Union.
Presidential Reconstruction: Johnson sought to implement Reconstruction through executive orders and proclamations, bypassing Congress. He appointed provisional governors in the Southern states, who were tasked with overseeing the process of restoring state governments and preparing for readmission to the Union.
Rejection of Radical Republican Demands: Johnson resisted the demands of the Radical Republicans in Congress for more aggressive measures against the former Confederate states. He opposed proposals for land redistribution, disenfranchisement of former Confederates, and the establishment of a strong federal presence in the South.
Emphasis on States' Rights: Johnson believed that the federal government should play a limited role in Reconstruction, and that the Southern states should be allowed to manage their own affairs. He argued that states' rights were essential for preserving the Union and preventing the erosion of state sovereignty.

Johnson's lenient approach to Reconstruction was controversial and met with strong opposition from the Radical Republicans. They accused him of being too lenient towards the former Confederates and of obstructing their efforts to secure the rights of African Americans and punish the leaders of the rebellion.

The conflict between Johnson and the Radical Republicans ultimately led to his impeachment in 1868. He was accused of violating the Tenure of Office Act, which prohibited the president from removing certain government officials without the consent of the Senate.

Clashes with Radical Republicans in Congress

President Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction policies and his lenient approach towards the defeated Confederate states brought him into direct conflict with the Radical Republicans in Congress. The Radical Republicans, led by Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner, demanded more aggressive measures to ensure the rights of African Americans and punish the former Confederate leaders.

The clashes between Johnson and the Radical Republicans manifested in several key areas:

Reconstruction Bills: The Radical Republicans passed a series of Reconstruction bills designed to protect the rights of African Americans, redistribute land to former slaves, and establish a strong federal presence in the South. Johnson vetoed many of these bills, arguing that they were unconstitutional and violated states' rights.
Impeachment: The Radical Republicans eventually impeached Johnson in 1868, accusing him of violating the Tenure of Office Act, which prohibited the president from removing certain government officials without the consent of the Senate. The charges stemmed from Johnson's dismissal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, a Radical Republican.
Tensions over Civil Rights: Johnson and the Radical Republicans also clashed over the issue of civil rights for African Americans. Johnson opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which granted African Americans full citizenship and equal rights, arguing that it was an overreach of federal power.
Presidential Reconstruction vs. Congressional Reconstruction: Johnson sought to implement Reconstruction through executive orders and proclamations, while the Radical Republicans wanted to control the process through legislation. This conflict led to a power struggle between the president and Congress.

The clashes between Johnson and the Radical Republicans were fueled by deep ideological differences. Johnson was a states' rights Democrat who believed in limited federal power, while the Radical Republicans were more centralist and believed that the federal government had a responsibility to protect the rights of all citizens, including African Americans.

The conflict between Johnson and the Radical Republicans ultimately led to his impeachment in 1868. Although Johnson was acquitted by the Senate, the impeachment proceedings further strained relations between the executive and legislative branches of government and contributed to the political instability of the Reconstruction Era.

Vetoes of Reconstruction bills

President Andrew Johnson's vetoes of Reconstruction bills passed by Congress were a major source of conflict between the executive and legislative branches of government. The Radical Republicans, who controlled Congress, saw these vetoes as an obstruction of their efforts to secure the rights of African Americans and punish the former Confederate states.

Johnson vetoed several key Reconstruction bills, including:

Freedmen's Bureau Bill: This bill would have extended the life of the Freedmen's Bureau, a federal agency that provided aid and support to freed slaves during the Reconstruction Era. Johnson vetoed the bill, arguing that it was unnecessary and that the Bureau was overstepping its authority.
Civil Rights Act of 1866: This bill would have granted African Americans full citizenship and equal rights, including the right to vote, hold office, and serve on juries. Johnson vetoed the bill, arguing that it was unconstitutional and that it violated states' rights.
Reconstruction Acts of 1867: These bills divided the former Confederate states into military districts and established a process for their readmission to the Union. Johnson vetoed these bills, arguing that they were unconstitutional and that they violated the rights of Southern states.

Johnson's vetoes of these bills were controversial and further strained relations between the president and Congress. The Radical Republicans accused Johnson of obstructing Reconstruction and of being sympathetic to the former Confederate states. They attempted to override Johnson's vetoes, but they were successful in overriding only a few of them.

The conflict between Johnson and the Radical Republicans over Reconstruction bills eventually led to Johnson's impeachment in 1868. Although Johnson was acquitted by the Senate, the impeachment proceedings further damaged his presidency and contributed to the political instability of the Reconstruction Era.

Johnson's vetoes of Reconstruction bills were a significant event in American history. They marked a clash between two branches of government over the scope of federal power and the future of the nation after the Civil War.

Dismissal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton

President Andrew Johnson's dismissal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton was a significant event that led to his impeachment in 1868. Stanton was a Radical Republican and a strong supporter of Reconstruction. His dismissal angered the Radical Republicans and provided them with a pretext to move forward with impeachment proceedings against Johnson.

Tenure of Office Act: In 1867, Congress passed the Tenure of Office Act, which prohibited the president from removing certain government officials, including the Secretary of War, without the consent of the Senate. Johnson believed that this law was unconstitutional and violated his authority as president.
Stanton's Refusal to Resign: After the passage of the Tenure of Office Act, Johnson requested Stanton's resignation. However, Stanton refused to resign, arguing that he was protected by the law. Johnson then suspended Stanton from office and appointed General Ulysses S. Grant as Secretary of War ad interim.
Impeachment: The Radical Republicans in Congress were outraged by Johnson's dismissal of Stanton. They saw it as a violation of the Tenure of Office Act and an attempt to undermine Reconstruction. They moved to impeach Johnson, charging him with "high crimes and misdemeanors."
Acquittal: Johnson was acquitted by the Senate by a single vote. Seven Republican senators voted to convict Johnson, but this was not enough to reach the two-thirds majority required for conviction. Johnson remained in office, but his presidency was severely weakened.

The dismissal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton was a major turning point in the Reconstruction Era. It led to the impeachment of President Johnson and further strained relations between the executive and legislative branches of government. It also contributed to the political instability of the Reconstruction Era.

Impeached by the House of Representatives

On February 24, 1868, President Andrew Johnson became the first president in American history to be impeached by the House of Representatives. The impeachment charges stemmed from Johnson's dismissal of Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton in violation of the Tenure of Office Act.

Tenure of Office Act: The Tenure of Office Act, passed by Congress in 1867, prohibited the president from removing certain government officials, including the Secretary of War, without the consent of the Senate. Johnson believed that this law was unconstitutional and violated his authority as president.
Stanton's Removal: In February 1868, Johnson dismissed Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, a Radical Republican and strong supporter of Reconstruction. Johnson claimed that Stanton was obstructing his efforts to implement Reconstruction and that he had lost confidence in him. However, Stanton refused to resign, arguing that he was protected by the Tenure of Office Act.
Impeachment Resolution: The Radical Republicans in Congress were outraged by Johnson's dismissal of Stanton. They saw it as a violation of the Tenure of Office Act and an attempt to undermine Reconstruction. On February 24, 1868, the House of Representatives voted to impeach Johnson, charging him with "high crimes and misdemeanors."
Articles of Impeachment: The House of Representatives approved 11 articles of impeachment against Johnson. The articles charged him with violating the Tenure of Office Act, obstructing Congress, and making speeches that were "inflammatory and calculated to bring the Congress into disrepute."

The impeachment of Andrew Johnson was a highly partisan affair. The Radical Republicans were determined to remove Johnson from office, while his supporters defended his actions as necessary to preserve the authority of the presidency. The impeachment trial in the Senate would ultimately determine Johnson's fate.

Acquitted by the Senate

President Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial began in the Senate on March 30, 1868. The trial lasted for three months, and it was one of the most dramatic and closely watched events in American history.

The prosecution team, led by House Manager Benjamin Butler, presented evidence and arguments against Johnson. They argued that Johnson had violated the Tenure of Office Act, obstructed Congress, and made speeches that were "inflammatory and calculated to bring the Congress into disrepute."

Johnson's defense team, led by lawyers William Evarts and Henry Stanbery, argued that Johnson had not violated the Tenure of Office Act and that his actions were within his authority as president. They also argued that the impeachment charges were politically motivated and that Johnson was being unfairly targeted by the Radical Republicans.

The Senate voted on each of the 11 articles of impeachment separately. A two-thirds majority vote was required to convict Johnson on any of the charges. In the end, Johnson was acquitted on all 11 articles. Seven Republican senators voted to convict Johnson, but this was not enough to reach the two-thirds majority required for conviction.

Johnson's acquittal was a major victory for him and his supporters. It also marked a turning point in the Reconstruction Era. The impeachment trial had deeply divided the country and further strained relations between the president and Congress. Johnson's acquittal allowed him to remain in office, but his presidency was severely weakened.

The acquittal of Andrew Johnson by the Senate is a significant event in American history. It demonstrated the strength of the presidency and the limits of congressional power. It also showed that the impeachment process is a political tool that can be used for partisan purposes.

Remains in office

Despite being impeached by the House of Representatives and acquitted by the Senate, President Andrew Johnson remained in office until the end of his term. This was a significant event in American history, as it demonstrated the strength of the presidency and the limits of congressional power.

Acquittal in the Senate: On May 16, 1868, the Senate voted to acquit President Johnson on all 11 articles of impeachment. Seven Republican senators voted to convict Johnson, but this was not enough to reach the two-thirds majority required for conviction. Johnson was therefore acquitted and remained in office.
Weakened Presidency: Johnson's acquittal was a victory for him and his supporters, but it also left his presidency severely weakened. The impeachment trial had deeply divided the country and further strained relations between the president and Congress. Johnson was unable to pass any significant legislation during the remainder of his term, and he was largely marginalized by the Radical Republicans.
Lame-Duck President: Johnson became a lame-duck president after his acquittal. He was ineligible to run for re-election in 1868, and he knew that his days in office were numbered. This made it difficult for him to govern effectively, as many people were unwilling to cooperate with a president who was on his way out.
End of Term: Johnson served out the remainder of his term, which ended on March 4, 1869. He was succeeded by Ulysses S. Grant, who had been elected president in the 1868 election.

Andrew Johnson's presidency was a tumultuous one. He was impeached by the House of Representatives, acquitted by the Senate, and remained in office until the end of his term. His presidency was marked by conflict and division, and he was unable to achieve many of his goals. However, Johnson's acquittal demonstrated the strength of the presidency and the limits of congressional power.

FAQ

Who was the first president to be impeached?

Andrew Johnson was the first president to be impeached by the House of Representatives.

What were the charges against Andrew Johnson?

Johnson was impeached on 11 charges, including violating the Tenure of Office Act, obstructing Congress, and making speeches that were "inflammatory and calculated to bring the Congress into disrepute."

Why was Andrew Johnson acquitted by the Senate?

Johnson was acquitted by the Senate because seven Republican senators voted to convict him, but this was not enough to reach the two-thirds majority required for conviction.

Did Andrew Johnson remain in office after being impeached?

Yes, Johnson remained in office until the end of his term. He was a lame-duck president and was unable to pass any significant legislation during the remainder of his term.

What was the impact of Andrew Johnson's impeachment?

Johnson's impeachment was a major turning point in the Reconstruction Era. It further divided the country and strained relations between the president and Congress. It also demonstrated the strength of the presidency and the limits of congressional power.

What are some of the lessons we can learn from Andrew Johnson's impeachment?

Johnson's impeachment teaches us about the importance of the separation of powers, the limits of presidential authority, and the role of Congress in holding the president accountable.

Closing Paragraph for FAQ

Andrew Johnson's impeachment was a significant event in American history. It demonstrated the strength of the presidency and the limits of congressional power. It also showed that the impeachment process is a political tool that can be used for partisan purposes. The lessons we can learn from Johnson's impeachment are still relevant today and can help us to better understand the American political system.

Tip: To learn more about Andrew Johnson's impeachment, you can visit the website of the United States Senate or the Library of Congress.

Tips

Introduction Paragraph for Tips

If you are interested in learning more about Andrew Johnson's impeachment, here are a few tips:

Tip 1: Visit the Library of Congress

The Library of Congress has a wealth of resources on Andrew Johnson and his impeachment. You can find books, articles, and other materials that will help you to learn more about this important event in American history.

Tip 2: Visit the website of the United States Senate

The website of the United States Senate has a section devoted to Andrew Johnson's impeachment. This section includes the text of the articles of impeachment, the transcript of the Senate trial, and other relevant documents.

Tip 3: Read books and articles about Andrew Johnson's impeachment

There are many books and articles that have been written about Andrew Johnson's impeachment. Some of the most popular and informative books include: "Impeachment: The Case of Andrew Johnson" by Michael Les Benedict and "Andrew Johnson: A Biography" by Hans L. Trefousse.

Tip 4: Watch documentaries and movies about Andrew Johnson's impeachment

There are also a number of documentaries and movies that have been made about Andrew Johnson's impeachment. Some of the most popular and informative documentaries include: "Impeachment: The Case of Andrew Johnson" (2019) and "Andrew Johnson: The Tailor President" (2017).

Closing Paragraph for Tips

These are just a few tips for learning more about Andrew Johnson's impeachment. By following these tips, you can gain a deeper understanding of this important event in American history.

Conclusion: Andrew Johnson's impeachment was a significant event in American history. It demonstrated the strength of the presidency and the limits of congressional power. It also showed that the impeachment process is a political tool that can be used for partisan purposes. The lessons we can learn from Johnson's impeachment are still relevant today and can help us to better understand the American political system.

Conclusion

Summary of Main Points

Johnson was impeached by the House of Representatives in 1868 on charges that he had violated the Tenure of Office Act, obstructed Congress, and made speeches that were "inflammatory and calculated to bring the Congress into disrepute."

Johnson was acquitted by the Senate in 1868, but his presidency was severely weakened. He was unable to pass any significant legislation during the remainder of his term and was largely marginalized by the Radical Republicans.

The lessons we can learn from Johnson's impeachment are still relevant today. They teach us about the importance of the separation of powers, the limits of presidential authority, and the role of Congress in holding the president accountable.

Closing Message

Andrew Johnson's impeachment was a complex and controversial event. It is important to remember that there were valid arguments on both sides of the issue. However, in the end, the Senate acquitted Johnson, and he remained in office until the end of his term.

The impeachment of Andrew Johnson is a reminder that the American political system is a delicate balance of power. The president, Congress, and the Supreme Court must all work together to ensure that the government functions properly. When one branch of government oversteps its bounds, the other branches must be prepared to act to restore the balance of power.

Andrew Johnson's impeachment is also a reminder that the impeachment process is a political tool that can be used for partisan purposes. It is important to be aware of this potential and to ensure that the impeachment process is used fairly and justly.